The world is highly confused, and highly confusing, for normal people.
Far more than a faster car a coulder refrigerator,  people need the little things, the unmarketable and untaxable things like love, family and comunity and something meaningful to do with our lifes.
We get into a false sense of independency thinking that being independent is to do everything by yourself  excuding your friends and family, just to end up alone asking yourself why you feel so empty.We take general cultural and social values like personal values this is not bad at all, but when those values are just racionalized and not integrated to our individuality a meaningful conection is lost in the process.
Our personal values that keep that meaningful coneccion came from our intimate very particular and distinctive family values, that are afected and afect the social values as a secundary consecuence.
 For the vast majority of human time on the planet, our families and local communities were the ultimate realities in our lifes.
 For all  there was only mistery beyond the boundaries of our local territories.
 Family and community were the world.
 But in recent years the family and the community, persue some fleeting materialistic ideals, have surrender to an abtraccion called society.

2010 Paradigm?

Do you know about the 2012 theories, how there is a lot of speculation about it.


Well, A long time ago when I was in University, one of my professors liked to talk about the differents paradigmas that shape up our world and the way how people think act and live.

One of his theories was that soon the world is coming to a revolution.. a scientific one..a mental one...a big change that will guide human race into a new Paradigma.

It is not the first time the world faces a big paradigmatic change: Babilonia; Copernicus; Christianism; Rome; Einstein; Freud...
So I been waiting for it, for the next one..

Well I always asumme will be defined more for something like: "the crash of the American Economie, wide world bankcrupt; a bomb, a global tsunami..."

But I am starting to think that is nothing like that.

Science and religion could never been mixed before, Freud and Einstein have a interesting discussion about it in a serial of letters that I remember reading in the past but I can't get a hold of them yet again.


Anyway my point is that With the last discoveries of the scientific world about the corelations between emotions-thougths and DNA. I can see something that I never consider possible, a communion between Science and Religion... and very well I think all the talking about how the human evolution can be close to a very big jump, and that all this changes are taking place while we are close to the 2012, the alignment of the planet, the upgrading on the vibration of the new generations...can be part of the same general scenario...

Why we focus in the "bad stuff" more?'

The world as it is, is neither good nor bad, It simply is.
Its goodness or badness, what it is, depends on who's looking at it.
 This is why the mass communication of the past several decades has been so profitable for goverments, merchants, and other people with agenda, offer point out a negative perspective of different aspects of the world intensify the fear then create a need from it and make profits out of it.
 "Create a need and fill it"
Using the morbosity and fear of people is  very profitable.
So what we can do to change that is intensify the positive side,  to look at it very close, and get just to do that every day.
Focus in the positive... sound easy ans is easy. Practise... c'mon.. do it rigth now!!

Entendemos que el universo físico que percibimos esta condicionado por nuestro sistema de creencias, por ello es tan necesario identificar y limpiar los traumas pasados ya que limitan nuestra percepción en el tiempo presente coartando nuestra libertad de elección ¿Si no veo la causa en mí como voy a poder resolver sus efectos?

Claro que:
Nuestra forma normal de manejar sentimientos desagradables nos lleva a evitar, negar o resistir ciertas experiencias. La resistencia produce más conflicto que a su vez genera una decisión eventual de evitar o negar ese problema o relación. Lo que se suprime es atraído una y otra vez a nuestra experiencia para ser comprendido y resuelto. Al negar o evitar esos problemas nos sentimos atrapados en nuestro medio, impotentes de hacer algo al respecto.

Cuando llega la comprensión, la repetición de experiencias negativas ya no es necesaria y nos sentimos libres, descubrimos una nueva manera de actuar.

The state of Yucatán not only has many Mayan pyramids, various colonial cities and 250 km. of sandy beaches, it also has some 900,000 acres of cattle, horse and grain country. This area of agriculture and animal husbandry, located around the bustling small city of Tizimín is located in the northeast part of the state, 160 km. east of Merida, 50 km. north of Valladolid, 200 km. west of Cancún and 40 km. south of Ria Lagartos. Tizimín is close to Mayan pyramids and numerous cenotes, one named Kikil in particular.



Tizimín, which means "tapir or Danta" (the sacred animal and totemic of the supreme God of the Maya), was founded by the Spanish Franciscan priest conquerors in 1544

 Visit Yucatan!
The state of Yucatán not only has many Mayan pyramids, various colonial cities and 250 km. of sandy beaches, it also has some 900,000 acres of cattle, horse and grain country. This area of agriculture and animal husbandry, located around the bustling small city of Tizimín is located in the northeast part of the state, 160 km. east of Merida, 50 km. north of Valladolid, 200 km. west of Cancún and 40 km. south of Ria Lagartos. Tizimín is close to Mayan pyramids and numerous cenotes, one named Kikil in particular.




Tizimín, which means "tapir or Danta" (the sacred animal and totemic of the supreme God of the Maya), was founded by the Spanish Franciscan priest conquerors in 1544

Sugar! The bad the good and the ugly.

 I got interestings facts and information about  sugar  artificial "sugar". People have to research and keep inform.
I am parafrasing Stephen Cherniski:
The BAD:.... "Recent research (March 2008) shows that sugar triggers overeating even in the absence of taste receptors. This suggests that the preference for high-calorie foods is based not only on the sweet taste, but biochemical signals derived from the caloric density of the food. Importantly, no such reaction was observed with sucralose.
So we stand at a crossroads because a few internet “health experts” are churning out reams of misinformation. Will we look for the facts or be swayed by folks with little regard for rigorous science? You may remember the dire warnings when the microwave oven was invented. Email didn’t exist then, but there were petitions being passed around and signs on health food stores. People were literally making stuff up (like the “radiation” would affect your thyroid) and others were repeating it in a spiral of deceit and confusion that is STILL reverberating around health circles even today. That’s 35 years of insufferable nonsense.

My point is this: People make things up all the time. People post lies on the internet and others forward them. And the more you see a piece of information, the more credibility it has… even if it is a blatant lie.

How many times have you heard this:

If you water your house plants with microwaved water, they will die.

The truth: This is an urban legend; a complete fabrication. I have conducted experiments with large numbers of pea plants watered with microwaved water or spring water. They grew to the same height and bore equal numbers of peas.

I often criticize the alternative health “movement” for lapses of scientific integrity. I promote critical thinking as a way to weed out fraud, and start every scientific/ medical presentation with a slide that reads:

Science cannot prevent people from lying, But it must endeavor to prevent lies from being taken as truth.

So when a handful of self-appointed health “experts” fill the internet with misinformation, I have to oppose that with the facts. I started with an essay entitled Poison in the Well (included here), in which I observed that the increasing level of misinformation threatens to render the internet useless as a source of knowledge. Somehow, we as a society have to develop critical thinking skills, chief among them being the willingness to evaluate the veracity of statements before forwarding them to one’s entire mailing list.

In this case, a quick investigation would reveal that the “Sucralose Toxicity Information Center” is really only one guy with no formal training in the biological sciences. A rigorous investigation would show that Joseph Mercola is using unscientific reasoning in his ongoing diatribe against everything “artificial.” Essentially, every other rant against sucralose parrots the twisted and tortured “logic” of these two sites. Citizens for Health started a petition to the FDA to ban sucralose. This was a travesty of science, completely unworthy of that fine organization, but that only proves that even intelligent, well-meaning people can get caught in the flood of “sky-is-falling” email.

The UGLY: "Remember the Y2K “disaster?” Which scenario got more press and attention; the experts who predicted a short interruption in a few systems, or the people who claimed that civilization was about to collapse? It may be human nature to pay more attention to disaster claims (as a survival mechanism) but a knee-jerk

response to every shriek from uninformed naysayers is only going to cause more confusion and error.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Please remember that if someone reads this text and my Poison in the Well essay, and still objects to the use of Sucralose, there are two solutions: they can use Xperia (containing stevia, apple and grape concentrates, or Vitality capsules which of course contain no sweetener.

2008 UPDATE The latest round of nonsense concerning sucralose includes claims that it is a “chlorinated hydrocarbon.” FACT: The term “chlorinated hydrocarbon” can be used to refer to ANY of the thousands of compounds containing chlorine, carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. Thus technically speaking, sucralose is a chlorinated hydrocarbon. But so is your blood. You simply cannot make blanket statements about enormous numbers of chemical compounds. Anti-sucralose crusaders want you to think that all chlorinated hydrocarbons are the same, when in fact some are inert (sucralose) and some will kill you. To suggest that sucralose is the same as a chlorinated pesticide is like saying that eating eggs is the same as drinking battery acid because both contain the element sulfur

The GOOD: "To verify the safety of sucralose, the manufacturer, the EPA, FDA and nine other international agencies including the World Health Organization, used the most sensitive and comprehensive testing imaginable. The unanimous finding was that only about 2% of ingested sucralose is absorbed, and this minute amount is quickly and easily metabolized by the liver and kidneys to toxicologically insignificant compounds that are excreted through the urine and intestinal tract. As a result, every nation that has studied sucralose has approved it without caution, warnings or limitations. So the naysayers are facing an avalanche of public support for sucralose. Ultimately, they will just quietly go away, but I have no idea how long that will take. Many people still think microwave ovens cause brain tumors.

NOTE: Clorine is the 19th most abundant element on the planet. Scientists have found more than 3,000 naturally-occurring chlorine compounds in plants (many of which we eat). Chlorine is essential to human life and is found in significant quantities in the blood. Your stomach uses large amounts of chlorine to create the hydrochloric acid that helps digest your food.

Anti-sucralose crusaders lament that Sucralose is a chloronated sugar, forgetting that table salt is chloronated sodium. In fact, a teaspoon of salt added to a pot of soup contains about 3,000 mg of chlorine. Compare that to a one-ounce serving

of AgelessXtra which contains 25 mg of Sucralose, the chlorine content of which is less than 3 mg, and even this 3 mg is essentially non-absorbable.

Onward! ..."

Stephen Cherniske

References i Reiser S, Szepesi B. SCOGS report on the health aspects of sucrose consumption. Am J Clin Nutr. 1978 Jan;31(1):9-11.

ii USDA figures reported at http://www.medicinenet.com

iii Dills WL. Protein fructosylation: Fructose and the Maillard reaction. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 58(suppl):779S-787S.